Comparison
Oral Slides vs Gamma
Narrated MP4 export vs. shareable web deck
Gamma reinvents the slide as a scrolling, web-native artifact. Oral Slides keeps the slide as a slide and adds narration to ship it as a video. Pick by delivery channel: link in a Notion doc, or MP4 in an LMS?
Feature comparison
| Feature | Oral Slides | Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| Output | Narrated MP4 | Web-shareable deck |
| Source | Existing `.pptx` | Prompt → generated deck |
| Narration / voice | Core feature, per-slide editable | Not a primary feature |
| Slide fidelity | Exact PowerPoint render | Reflowed into Gamma layouts |
| Distribution | MP4 file (LMS, email, drive) | Public URL |
| Best for | Async video, training, lectures | Pitch decks, web-native reading |
Workflow side-by-side
Pair them
Use Gamma to draft a deck and export to PowerPoint, then upload to Oral Slides for narration. You get both a shareable URL and a downloadable MP4.
Oral Slides standalone
For decks that already exist (sales, training, internal updates), drop the `.pptx` and export an MP4 in a single sitting.
FAQ
- Can Oral Slides export a web deck?
- No. The output is always an MP4. If you need a hosted web deck, Gamma is the better fit.
- Does Gamma export to MP4 with narration?
- Gamma is moving toward more video features but does not currently match the per-slide narration workflow Oral Slides was built for.
Try Oral Slides on a real deck
Upload a `.pptx`, pick a voice, export an MP4. The first project is free.